tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5901313253249759157.post8632687989333360127..comments2010-09-23T12:04:14.821-07:00Comments on Boddhisattva Leguru: Why we love to hate lawyersleguruhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14775519662902807139noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5901313253249759157.post-34309319265246667832010-09-23T12:04:14.821-07:002010-09-23T12:04:14.821-07:00"..admitting (crime y) instead and you'll..."..admitting (crime y) instead and you'll get..."<br /><br />is what i meant to typeUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03896074786141936476noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5901313253249759157.post-24920054822678801912010-09-23T12:02:24.549-07:002010-09-23T12:02:24.549-07:00This is a fact. I know because it happened to me. ...This is a fact. I know because it happened to me. What they do is throw the book at you, beyond all sense of rational fairness, and make it so extremely risky for you to go to trial, that ususally people don't take the risk. Here, you can face thirty years in jail for (crime x), or you can sign this statement admitting and you'll get 90 days and probation. The disparity betweent he two is powerful evidence of its arbitrary meaning/fairness. If a single act can be so completely-differently treated, then the laws are bad. That simple.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03896074786141936476noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5901313253249759157.post-27969472696141061422009-09-02T19:36:30.699-07:002009-09-02T19:36:30.699-07:00Forgot to add the source: http://www.skeptic.com/e...Forgot to add the source: http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/09-09-02leguruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14775519662902807139noreply@blogger.com